Friday, February 17, 2012

Jose Rizal is Jack The Ripper



Claim:


"Jack the Ripper" is the best-known name given to an unidentified serial killer who was active in the largely impoverished areas in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888. He was so called because of a letter who was written by someone who claims he was the killer, however the letter was considered as a hoax. Another names to him are "The Whitechapel Murderer" and "Leather Apron".

While Jose Rizal was in London, Jack The Ripper was present and when he went back to the Philippines, the killings had stopped. It was very mysterious! Could it be just a coincidence? Or not?

By the way, Jack The Ripper likes girls, while Jose Rizal was quite similar to him. They both have the same initials too, J.R.

For those who don't know Jose Rizal, he is the national hero of the Philippines though not legally official.

José Protacio Rizal Mercado y Alonzo Realonda (Jose Rizal) was a Filipino polymath, patriot and the most prominent advocate for reform in the Philippines during the Spanish colonial era. He is regarded as the foremost Filipino patriot.[Click Here]

Let's find out...

Legend:


While searching everything about Jose Rizal in the internet, I stumbled upon this summary of his life while living at London.
Rizal was in London from May 1888 to January 1889, in the British Library copying "Sucesos de las islas Filipinas" by hand because there were no photocopying machines at the time. Jack the Ripper was active around this time, and since we do not know what Rizal did at night or on the days he was not in the library, some people would like to believe Rizal is suspect. They argue that when Rizal left London, the Ripper murders stopped. They say that Jack the Ripper must have had some medical training, based on the way his victims were mutilated. Rizal, of course, was a doctor. Jack the Ripper liked women, and so did our own Rizal. And -- this is so obvious that many overlooked it -- Jose Rizal's initials match those of Jack the Ripper!

Infos



Actually the case was still unsolved. Till now everything about it is a speculation. Here's a brief information about Rizal and the Ripper in London:

Jose Rizal
Jack the Ripper
He was a doctor. (An ophtalmologist particularly) He is suspected to be a doctors (the removal of the victims’ organs implied anatomical knowledge).
He is a multi-talented person, and could even speak English fluently. The Ripper is an Englishmen.
Rizal lived in Beckett family at Crescent, London. Ripper killed prostitutes in Whitechapel, London.
He is known for having many lovers. His victims are all women.
Rizal copied, by hand, the book Sucesos de las islas Filipinas at daylight. Ripper killed prostitutes always at night time in the East End.
Rizal is a Freemason. In the word 'Juwes', which might mean Freemason, makes him related somehow to it.
He leaved London on January, 1889. On July, 1889, another victim was believed to be killed by the Ripper.
Jose Rizal's initial is JR. Jack the Ripper's initial is also JR.


This is the events that happened in London at the time when Jose Rizal and Jack the Ripper was in the said city. (In chronological order.)

-----
DATE:
Jose Rizal
Jack the Ripper
February 3, 1888 As the controversy over his novel raged, Rizal got involved in the Kalamba tenant's fight to correct generations-old abuses commited against them. Thus, the security for the Rizal family became a problem. Then, they advised Jose Rizal to leave the Philippines. He departed secretly for Hong Kong, then to Japan, and to United States.
-----
May 13 to 16, 1888 Dr. Jose P. Rizal stayed at the Fifth Avenue Hotel, New York City.
-----
May 16, 1888 He gathered enough funds for a trip to London onboard the luxurious liner CITY OF ROME.
-----
May 24, 1888 He arrived in Liverpool, then went on to London, where he eventually settled down at No. 37 Chalcot, Crescent (with the Beckett Family).
-----
-----
While in London, Dr. Rizal copied the book Sucesos de las islas Filipinas written by Antonio de Morga in the library of British Museum.[1]
-----
June 13, 1888 He wrote a letter to his family informing them where he was that time.
-----
August 31, 1888
-----
Jack the Ripper started his killings. (First victim, Mary Ann "Polly" Nichols)
September 8, 1888
-----
Jack the Ripper killed his second victim - Annie Chapman.
September 25, 1888
-----
A post card was sent to 'Dear Boss', the head of the Central News Agency, signed 'Yours truly, Jack the Ripper.'
September 30, 1888
-----
Jack the Ripper killed two women in the same day - Elizabeth Stride and Catharine Eddowes, found half-a-mile apart.
-----
-----
[The words 'The Juwes are the men that Will not be Blamed for nothing', were chalked, seemingly by Jack, on a doorway immediately above a portion of the bloodstained apron of victim Catharine Eddowes. The word 'Juwes' may mean a code-word for the Freemasons, or the Jews.]
November 9, 1888
-----
Jack the Ripper killed his last victim, Mary Jane Kelly.
-----
[Dr. Jose Rizal wrote letters to his friend Blumentritt from London, however there were no letters written to his family or friends from July, 1888 - November 14, 1888.] [Between August 31 to November 9, 1888, five prostitutes were killed in Whitechapel, always late at night.]
January, 1889 Dr. Jose P. Rizal left London.
-----
July, 1889
-----
After nine months from the last Ripper killing, Alice Mackenzie was murdered, and once claimed as a Ripper victim, although the police did not think so at the time.
-----
There were fifteen leading candidates for the true identity of Jack the Ripper. Three of them were highly suspected, namely Montague Druitt; 'Kosminski’, a Polish Jew; and ‘Michael Ostrog, a Russian doctor.’ All were documented in MacNaghten Memorandum. But the more highly suspected and convincing of the three is Montague Druitt.[2][3]
[1]The book tells a fair presentation of a 16th century Philippine culture and civilization. (If you notice some defects in Filipino race, maybe you read the book yourself in order to make a better judgement of the present.)

[2]There appeared to be a good deal of evidence linking him with the Ripper. In 1913, Mac-Naghten told the Daily Mail that he had ‘a very clear idea’ who the Ripper was, but had ‘destroyed all the documents and there is now no record of the secret information which came into my possession at one time or another.’ A journalist with good police contacts, G.R. Sims, stated in 1903 that ‘the body of the man suspected by the chiefs of Scotland Yard, and by his own friends, who were in communication with the Yard, was found in the Thames.’ Druitt indeed committed suicide in the Thames around November 30th, 1888, shortly after being dismissed as a schoolteacher in Blackheath, and three weeks after the last Ripper murder. Druitt, who was also a barrister, had chambers at King’s Bench Walk, within walking distance of the East End, and apparently had a cousin who was a doctor with offices in the Minories, on the border of the East End.

[3]In some sources, the evidences pointed James Maybrick to be Jack the Ripper. Well, all or almost all of the evidence pointing him are highly convincing making him the killer.

Other things about Jose Rizal:
  • He was a Malay.

  • He would have been 27 years old at the time of the Ripper killings.

  • He was short, had dark skin, dark hair, and dark eyes.

  • He came from a well to do family, was well dressed and looked respectable.

  • He was executed in the Philippines on December 30, 1896 at the age of 35.

  • Had a romantic relationship with Gertrude Beckett - daughter of Charles Beckett.

  • After he died, his mother tried to procure his assets which consisted of some pretty nice jewelry including gold cuff links and other baubles of diamonds and amethysts (gold chain with a red stone seal?)

  • Conclusion:



    Well, as soon as Jack the Ripper is still unknown, no one can say that Jose Rizal isn't him. We, Filipinos see this intelligent little guy a hero, good, patriot, and brave man for writing Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. Are we so sure that there is no bad side of him? If you notice, in El Fili, Simoun is brave, dark and vengeful who thinks of killing the influential people in Paulita and Juanito Pelaez's wedding day. I don't mean of anything. I just open some possibilities which make him suspect of being JACK THE RIPPER.

    However, if it is true that Alice Mackenzie was indeed one of Jack the Ripper's victims, then probably Jose Rizal was not him because at the time she was killed, Jose Rizal was not present anymore in London. Aside of that, there is no strong evidence to prove that he is the Ripper. They don't even have a connection with each other. I personally believe he is NOT.

    I asked my professor in 'The Life of Jose Rizal' once about this intriguing controversy. She didn't tell me exactly if she do believe that Dr. Jose Rizal is indeed Jack the Ripper. She told me that even the the most silent person in the world do have a secret, and Rizal might be one of them. She also told me that there are some proofs that point him to be the killer, but not too strong to hold the claim. I asked her what proofs, but she just became silent and closed the topic eventually. I don't know if she knew something. But one thing for sure, as long as Jack the Ripper is still not identified, claims of his identity will just rose from no where.

    I highly advise you to search for yourself information that disproves the legend, not to prove it. You know, its embarrassing if you believe he is. Jose Rizal is the perfect picture of a true Filipino, not only for being small but for being just HIM - patriot, talented, multi-lingual ... name it. Remember, Ninoy Aquino died the same reason why our national hero die for. I can't imagine if my favorite hero is a killer. I don't know if you feel the same way too.

    Sources:

    http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/philippine_urban_legends
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_the_Ripper
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Rizal
    AmateurSleuth: forum.casebook.org
    http://filipinohome.com/02_03_01rizal_london.html
    Book: The Hunt for Jack the Ripper by: William D. Rubinstein

    44 comments:

    1. come on! this is just another urban legend!

      ReplyDelete
    2. Based on profiling, the probability that Jose Rizal was indeed Jack the Ripper is over 90%.

      ReplyDelete
    3. There may be a possibility but we are certainly not sure. we may conclude but our conclusions do not have valid evidence to prove that jose rizal is Jack the Ripper

      ReplyDelete
    4. I love Rizal.. However I believe that everyone has a secret... Which infact, all the info doesn't have a valid evidence/proof. It's really intriguing...

      ReplyDelete
    5. Jose Rizal ...Is Jack The Ripper.
      The evidence lies in an old vault that is being secretly held by The Jesuits of Manila.
      JRCF#344 (This code is the clincher.)

      ReplyDelete
    6. it was Rizals pleasure to kill, may be..

      ReplyDelete
    7. Jose Rizal and Jack the Ripper are not the same. Ripper hates girls uhmm.. because he's not capable in something in girls... His true name is Walter Sickert... So please respect Jose Rizal...

      ReplyDelete
    8. Accdg to my Prof., Rizal was molested as a child. And that COULD BE a reason for those killings.

      ReplyDelete
    9. You who believe in this theory has nothing but a brain as small as pea, they call it pea-brain and dick-head. To believe that a person like Rizal who would risk his life to protect the honor of a woman will be Jack the Ripper is downright outrageous and disrespect the National Hero of the Philippines. I doubt whether you are Filipino. You dont even know that the Official National Hero of the Philippines is Rizal. A man in the stature of Rizal who is a friend of many great men in those hard times, who cured people and help people in Dapitan, who was brave to defend his innocence against Spain, and who is a genius with prophetic mind can even do such evil deeds as you try to convince the readers of this blog. Rizal was of many talents he has no lost time and would spend writing not just letters but but many ideas. As written in his diary, he would write at night and when he is not writing he would do sculpture works while in London and socialize with new found friends. Jack the Ripper to escape detection after killing must be knowledgeable of London which is for a first timer like Rizal would be like a maze. One can get lost in London if you have not been there. So even that alone, its impossible for Rizal to be the Ripper such he was new and didn't know London. He could have easily been caught. Jack the Ripper is one who lived and died in London and certainly that's not Rizal idiot.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. you know i have a secret book of rizal it contents a magic words.. rizal used an oracion to escape his enemy many times...

        Delete
      2. You who can't speak (write) English correctly is the idiot.

        Delete
      3. I pity your ignorance. You claim like you are 100% sure, but your arguments are laughable.
        "One can get lost if you have not been there." <- So he is not Rizal?
        "He could have easily been caught." <- That does not prove anything.
        "A man in the stature of Rizal..." <- Fool. There are noble killers. That doesn't cross Rizal out.
        "Rizal was of many talents he has no lost time..." <- Being talented doesn't make you a suspect?
        "I doubt whether you are Filipino." <- Being not as ignorant as you and being open to possibility determines your nationality?

        By all means, you are an idiot. Speaking in English with a long paragraph or nonsense? Yeah. That proves a lot.

        Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      ReplyDelete
    11. To the blogger, You may research also if Rizal was the father of Adolf Hitler.....

      ReplyDelete
    12. Rizal is Jack the Ripper. this is true.. that's the real reason why he was executed.. As per Dr. Rogie F. Uckmann and Atty. Cheskalyn A. Dickins

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. No, he was executed because in the Philippine Revolution the Katipuneros was shouting his name so while he was in a ship going to Cuba to be a doctor to serve Spain in a war there he was sailed back to Manila.

        Delete
      2. AS WAT IVE READ EARLIER IN ANOTHER LINK IT WASNT RIZAL, IT WAS KOSMINSKI WHO IS THE SERIAL KILLER HERE IS THE LINK TRY TO READ.

        Delete
      3. as what ive read earlier in another link it wasnt Rizal, it was kosminski who was the serial killer here is the link try to read....http://kickerdaily.com/case-solved-at-last-dna-evidence-reveals-jack-the-rippers-identity/

        Delete
    13. the mystery of who really is Jack the Ripper can never be solved. not unless we have a time machine which can transport us back to that time period. Jose Rizal was a great man, he died for his beloved country the Philippines, that is a fact. suggesting that he is Jack the Ripper seems far fetched. but thinking logically, we can never really be sure, can we??? we weren't there when all this happened. also remember, every person has his/her own dark secrets, that includes Jose Rizal. so until a solid evidence comes up, the real identity of Jack the Ripper will never be known......

      ReplyDelete
    14. This comment has been removed by the author.

      ReplyDelete
    15. This comment has been removed by the author.

      ReplyDelete
    16. Its could be a coincidence that when Jose Rizal was on London the killings have started and besides the place where the killings were made was on Whitechapel and based on my research Rizal didn't stayed there. But we still don't know the real identity of the notorious serial killer of all time, Jack the Ripper

      ReplyDelete
    17. Please bear with me if this stuff that im about to mention are a little bit to far-fetch.
      Here's my little understanding (Personal Perception) about the peeps that happens to be very famous in our History:

      I don't know where to start.. well how about from this guy

      -Leonardo da vinci - a freemason

      This site is quite rare : Here is the main http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread607910/pg1&mem=Onboard2

      Here are the sub:

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Was_Leonardo_da_vinci_a_free_mason
      http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1838189/pg1

      Remark: Lots of site in google search engine provokes you to believe that Leonardi wasnt a Freemason.

      Our beloved All-star National B.S heroes according to our BS "Historian ignorant teachers" in class. -sigh. But we MUST not blame them for they were just also taught by their preceding lecturers and so on..

      The list:

      -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Freemasons_(A_-_D)
      -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Freemasons_(E_-_Z)

      Do not look to shock if your Most Wanted National Hero is on the list.


      Bottomline: If you become a Freemason, 50 years from now the WORLD will remember you. All members ARE all ACTION STAR, ACE PLAYER, KEY PLAYERS, TOP BRASS, BIG WHEEL, TOP CAT, CAPTAIN, YOU NAME IT ALL. wanna know why? hmmmm.... its very.. very.. very.. very SIMPLE!

      1 John 2:15

      Do not love the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world.…

      Jesus Christ owns the World, But Satan Dominates the world since from the beginning of time that eve disobey Jesus order.

      In heaven, there is already a rebellious act. Lucifer VS. The Holy Father, i think he's really jealous of The Father for we. humans, dont have a freakin clue. Envy much?? lol.

      The Holy Father created humans. Then Lucifer created science, sci-fi, Robots, Cartoons, Walt Disney, even adoption, Birth Control.

      Everything that the Lord hath created, the curse (satan) wants to compete and rebel. well, i think that's really his thing lol...

      Think all you wanted to think, we all are rationale being anyway but that's how i perceived the B.S of this world. plain and simple! :))

      ReplyDelete
    18. Satanism is a vital philosophy which asks you to take your fate in your own hands--break the barriers that confine you--sweep aside all that is smothering you--realize your full innate power. The most important commandment of Satanism is: Satanism demands study - not worship.

      Satan does not need to receive worship to achieve his goals. All he has to do is to keep a man from following Jesus. Satan knows that anyone who does not follow in the teachings of Jesus does not have God. (2 John 9)

      ReplyDelete
    19. The knowledge that Jesus offers is not the same as the 'knowledge' that the Illuminati offers. Christ tried to teach us the power of love, grace, forgiveness, and goodness, and He tried to teach us how to reconnect to God the Father. The knowledge of the Illuminati is the same old 'new age' crap that the serpent used to trick Eve in the garden of eden... the false believe that we can become as God. They view our God as only an advanced being and that with enough knowledge and development anybody can become like Him. That's worked out really well for Lucifer so far...

      The sight Jesus was referring to was an advanced understanding of the importance of love. Humans did not understand love during His last visit, they only understood obedience to rules and rituals. His message was a vision that most could not see and could not understand because they were blind to love.

      What value is there in worshiping yourself? Anything that is, came from the one Creator, and only the Creator deserves our worship.

      ReplyDelete
    20. in your conclusion 2nd paragraph.
      maybe rizal contacted one person to kill alice so others will think that rizal is not Jack Ripper.

      ReplyDelete
    21. Ewan ko at ewan natin sinong may pakana? At ngayon di pa rin alam kung bat tayo nandito.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. pwede bang itigil mona?

        Delete
    22. Ewan mo at ewan natin sinong may pakana? wahahahahaha.... how deep could the motors of your brain capable of deciphering a positive result? I mean, don't you have the capacity to dig up some relics from our "PAST" our human race? HISTORY!

      who doesn't love his history will experience the same BS all over again.. and we HUMANS, we love to complain.. WTF is wrong in our world?? wahahahahha.... seriously?? i mean, give yourself a favor my friend. dig a little bit, just a little bit you might figure out it's worth doing. :))

      ReplyDelete
    23. and when you start digging bring Jesus the Christ with you.. soon in time you'll understand why you need him or MUST be with him. ^_^

      it is scary btw!

      ReplyDelete
    24. we dont have that much evidence to prove that he really was Jack the Ripper ..

      ReplyDelete
    25. According to Kicker Daily News: The world’s most famous and mysterious serial killer of all time is a Polish immigrant and salon worker Aaron Kosminski - a known paranaoid schizophrenic. You can check it here for more information. - http://kickerdaily.com/case-solved-at-last-dna-evidence-reveals-jack-the-rippers-identity

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. You beat me to it. I was about to post that too. Hahaha! :)

        Delete
      2. Thank you for that information ... I will be revising this article once I got a free time. :) Thank you ...

        Delete
    26. Jack the Ripper, the mystery serial killer who terrorised London prostitutes in the late 19th century, was a Polish immigrant barber, according to a new book which analysed DNA samples from the time.

      While the ripper's true identity has remained unknown for more than a century, suspects have over the years included members of the royal family and prime ministers.

      However Russell Edwards, an independent investigator, says that DNA from a shawl recovered from the scene of one of the ripper's deeds matched relatives of both the victim and suspect, Aaron Kosminski.

      Edwards said it was beyond doubt that Kosminski was behind the at least five killings in 1888.

      The shawl reportedly belonged to victim, Catherine Eddowes. It was said to have been kept by a police officer investigating the scene of Eddowe's murder and later passed to his descendants, until it was acquired by Edwards at auction in 2007.

      He then enlisted the help of a molecular biologist Jari Louhelainen, of Liverpool John Moores University, to conduct DNA tests.

      Working on the blood stains, he matched DNA on the shawl to that of Karen Miller, a direct descendant of Eddowes.

      Meanwhile stains on the material suggested the presence of bodily fluid, which Louhelained was able to match to a descendant of Kosminski, the AFP news agency reported.

      Kosminski was identified as a suspect but there was never enough evidence to bring him to trial. He died in 1899 after contracting gangrene in his leg.

      Edwards' book is released on Tuesday.

      However, Some scientists, including Professor Alec Jeffreys, who invented the DNA fingerprinting, called for further verification.

      The research has not been published a peer-reviewed scientific journal, meaning the claims cannot be independently verified or the methodology scrutinised.

      ReplyDelete
    27. Freemason deals Satan and Satan use Rizal and Rizal himself allowing Satan to control him BUT it doesn't mean that Rizal was The Jack the Ripper ......common guys

      ReplyDelete
    28. Aaron Kosminski (born Aron Mordke Kozminski; 11 September 1865 – 24 March 1919) was a Polish Jew who was admitted to Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum in 1891.[19] "Kosminski" (without a forename) was named as a suspect by Melville Macnaghten in his 1894 memorandum and by former Chief Inspector Donald Swanson in handwritten comments in the margin of his copy of Assistant Commissioner Sir Robert Anderson's memoirs. Anderson wrote that a Polish Jew had been identified as the Ripper but that no prosecution was possible because the witness was also Jewish and refused to testify against a fellow Jew. Some authors are skeptical of this, while others use it in their theories. In his memorandum, Macnaghten stated that no one was ever identified as the Ripper, which directly contradicts Anderson's recollection.In 1987, Ripper author Martin Fido searched asylum records for any inmates called Kosminski, and found only one: Aaron Kosminski. Kosminski lived in Whitechapel;however, he was largely harmless in the asylum. His insanity took the form of auditory hallucinations, a paranoid fear of being fed by other people, and a refusal to wash or bathe.In his book, The Cases That Haunt Us, former FBI profiler John Douglas states that a paranoid individual such as Kosminski would likely have openly boasted of the murders while incarcerated had he been the killer, but there is no record that he ever did so. In 2014, DNA analysis claimed to have proved Kosminski's semen was on a victim's scarf, but this evidence and conclusion have not been subject to peer review.

      Aaron Kosminski, A Freemason?? NOT! So, therefore, not the suspect. Try harder! We might be deceived. :)

      ReplyDelete
    29. It reminds me a famous intriguing movie i've watched.. "perfume"..

      ReplyDelete
    30. Do not believe this article.....the real Jack The Ripper have been verified.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Then, who is he?

        Delete
      2. Aaron Kosminski.... thanks to the help of DNA.

        Delete
      3. "A great deal is at stake if the Establishment considers it necessary to operate a full scale cover-up," writes Knight. "For the truth of the Jack the Ripper affair to have been painstakingly concealed can mean nothing less than State security was at risk, or that someone high in the Government or the Royal Family was involved."

        Author Stephen Knight, in his out of print masterpiece, "Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution," explains how Britain's entire political system at the end of the 19th century was threatened by the hidden facts -- Prince Albert Victor ("Eddy") was not only bisexual, but he had married a Roman Catholic girl and fathered a child with her. Evidently these debaucheries were so scandalous that the Ruling Class would not abide even the slightest hint of this revelation.

        When a group of working girls (Annie Chapman, Marie Kelly, Elizabeth Stride and Mary Nichols) decided to blackmail the Royals, the Marquess of Salisbury, then Prime Minister, had to take care of the problem. He entrusted Sir William Gull, physician and abortionist to the Royal Family, for the mission.

        One of the country's most prominent Freemasons, Gull understood that "Freemasonry was the power behind the Government and it was the unseen influence of the Masonic elders which dictated major policies, not the pleasing façade of Commons debate."

        The deliberately engineered panic, i.e., the murder of five prostitutes, was done according to Masonic ritual. The ritual murder and disembowelment "met with such ghastly success because of the audacity with which they were executed," said Walter Sickert, Knight's informant whose painter-father had intimate knowledge of the Cleveland Street murders. This so-called "audacity" is a trademark of Masonic "mischief-making."

        "Freemasons applaud violence, terror and crime, provided it is carried out in a crafty manner," writes Knight. "Humor is all important and the most appalling crimes may be committed under its cloak."

        In fact, one of the key Masonic insights into human nature, says Knight, is the reaction of people to terrorism and serial ritual murders executed with great skill. In other words, people will marvel and say, "What a dirty trick, but how skillfully executed. What a swindle, but how well and with what courage it has been done."


        The greatest deceive of Satan is to allow people to think that his presence doesn't Exist. Some people are just to dumbfounded and ignorants. Keep feeding Lies and ill pay you back with Truth!

        Delete
    31. The case remains one of the world's greatest unsolved murder mysteries and over the years many suspects have been brought into the frame including Prince Albert Victor, Queen Victoria's grandson; Sir William Gull, the Queen's physician; and Sir Walter Sickert, a renowned painter of the time.
      Identity parade: New Scotland Yard's four suspects in the Ripper case (from left to right) include Montague John Druitt, Michael Ostrog, Aaron Kosminski and Dr Francis J.Tumblety

      Rizal (JR) arrived in Liverpool on May 24, 1888 then boarded a train
      to London He stayed in part with the Beckett Family in an affluent
      place in London. Now read over my shoulder the news headlines that
      dominated London. The most vicious crime of the century that started few days after his arrival. These were the accepted victims of Jack the Ripper

      Mary Ann Nichols
      August 31, 1888

      Annie Chapman
      September 8, 1888

      Elizabeth Stride
      September 30, 1888

      Catherine Eddowes
      September 30, 1888

      Mary Jane Kelly
      November 9, 1888

      ReplyDelete
    32. Thank you for the new information about Aaron Kosminski ... But don't discredit my integrity as a writer. First of all, the latest findings were unfolded just recently - September 2014, while this article was created on February 17, 2012. I wasn't updated because of some events that happened to me this year. I will revise the article... Don't worry.

      ReplyDelete